Skip to company research
TMC InsightPowered byFusionScore.ai
Buyer’s Guide: Company Profile

11:11 Systems

Explore 11:11 Systems’s services, potential fit for different businesses, how it compares with alternatives, and what to ask before choosing a provider.

Buyer’s Guide visibility

11:11 Systems ranked #1

The search

Buyer
Enterprises evaluating fully managed or co-managed DRaaS to protect virtualized and physical workloads against unplanned downtime
Region
United States

Sep 29, 2026 · 10 entries returned

Is this your company? Go beyond a single category.

Build your multi-category AI visibility month after month with FAME (FusionScore AI Mention Engine). Start with a free $3,000-value package: audit, calendar & 2 articles.

Get FAME Free Explore monthly plans

This page records how AI systems present this company to buyers: what they pick up and where their picture may be incomplete or mistaken. Community notes are reader submissions, separate from the AI results.

Question 1

What does 11:11 Systems do?

11:11 Systems is a managed infrastructure solutions provider specializing in cloud hosting, connectivity, and data security. The company delivers infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS), backup-as-a-service (BaaS), and disaster-recovery-as-a-service (DRaaS) to mid-market and enterprise organizations. Operating at the infrastructure, platform resilience, and managed operations layers of the technology stack, 11:11 Systems helps IT teams migrate legacy environments, automate offsite business continuity, and defend against cyber threats like ransomware. Its business model relies on multi-tenant and dedicated recurring subscriptions paired with managed services and recovery support.

Sources: [3] [4] [15] [16]

Question 2

What products, services and core capabilities does 11:11 Systems offer?

The 11:11 Systems portfolio centers on VMware-based cloud hosting, modern data protection, and business continuity. Its core offerings include 11:11 Cloud for virtual private and hybrid cloud hosting, Cloud Backup (BaaS) for servers and Microsoft 365, and Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) supporting automated failover and failback. For resilience and network operations, 11:11 delivers managed recovery orchestration, cyber incident recovery platforms, and managed connectivity including Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) and direct cloud connects. Managed security services incorporate continuous threat monitoring, endpoint detection, and perimeter firewalls. Workloads are deployed across global data centers in North America, EMEA, and APAC. Environments are managed through the proprietary 11:11 Cloud Console, providing integrated visibility across workloads, data protection policies, and compliance reporting.

Sources: [1] [2] [4] [15]

Question 3

What types of organizations are a good fit for 11:11 Systems?

11:11 Systems is a strong fit for mid-sized to enterprise organizations running traditional on-premises or virtualized workloads, especially those anchored on VMware infrastructure. It particularly serves healthcare, financial services, legal, and public sector organizations that face strict regulatory mandates around audit readiness and data sovereignty. Organizations with lean internal IT teams benefit from its assisted onboarding, runbook development, and fully managed failover services. Conversely, companies operating purely cloud-native architectures on hyperscalers without VMware dependencies or those seeking self-managed, unbundled commodity object storage find less alignment with 11:11 Systems' managed infrastructure model.

Sources: [2] [3] [4]

Question 4

Who are 11:11 Systems's main competitors and alternatives?

11:11 Systems competes with multi-cloud infrastructure and managed disaster recovery vendors that support enterprise continuity and cloud migration. Key competitors include TierPoint, Expedient, Flexential, Recovery Point Systems, and Opti9. These companies deliver managed disaster recovery, private cloud, and backup services to organizations requiring high availability and regulatory compliance across hybrid environments.

Sources: [7] [8] [9] [11] [12] [13] [14]

What the AI said and what we found

What the AI said

11:11 Systems competes with multi-cloud infrastructure and managed disaster recovery vendors that support enterprise continuity and cloud migration. Key competitors include TierPoint, Expedient, Flexential, Recovery Point Systems, and Opti9. These companies deliver managed disaster recovery, private cloud, and backup services to organizations requiring high availability and regulatory compliance across hybrid environments.

What we found when we checked

Some points were supported, while others needed more context or changes.

  • 11:11 Systems is a managed infrastructure solutions provider delivering DRaaS, cloud, connectivity, and security services.
  • TierPoint offers Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) and enterprise cloud solutions across more than 40 nationwide U.S. data centers.
  • TierPoint also provides colocation services across its U.S. data center network.
  • Expedient delivers disaster recovery as a service and enterprise cloud management.
  • Flexential provides DRaaS solutions and cloud replication across U.S. data centers.
  • Recovery Point Systems delivers multiplatform orchestrated DRaaS covering distributed systems and enterprise mainframes.
  • Opti9 delivers managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) using Veeam and AWS cloud architectures.

What we changed

We kept supported details and removed or qualified points that the independent check could not confirm.

Sources we used

Question 5

How does 11:11 Systems compare with its key alternatives?

11:11 Systems positions itself as an integrated managed infrastructure provider uniting cloud, connectivity, and cyber resilience. Compared to colocation-centric rivals like TierPoint and Flexential, 11:11 emphasizes a software-driven cloud platform with unified management and a global data footprint. Against multiplatform specialists like Recovery Point Systems, 11:11 focuses on VMware and hypervisor-level replication (Veeam, Zerto) rather than mainframe legacy estates. Buyers choose 11:11 Systems when consolidating multi-region VMware workloads with turnkey disaster recovery. TierPoint's DRaaS platform supports HPE Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, IBM Recovery, and VMware Live Site Recovery across more than 40 U.S. data centers alongside colocation. 11:11 DRaaS supports both physical and virtualized workloads recoverable to 11:11's secure cloud, AWS, or Azure using Cohesity, Veeam, HPE, and Zerto technologies. Recovery Point Systems supports non-x86 architectures including IBM iSeries and Z Mainframes, while 11:11 concentrates on x86 virtualized and cloud workloads. 11:11 Systems holds VMware Cloud Service Provider Pinnacle Tier status under the Broadcom Advantage Partner Program. Overall positioning 11:11 Systems operates as a global managed infrastructure and resilience provider delivering cloud hosting, data protection, and DRaaS. Key differentiators Unified 11:11 Cloud Console management, global VMware Pinnacle partner status, and multi-region failover across North America, Europe, and APAC. Data Center & Colocation DRaaS Providers Overlap: Replication, automated failover, and managed backup for VMware and enterprise virtual environments. Important differences: TierPoint and Flexential operate massive physical data center and colocation campuses, whereas 11:11 Systems focuses primarily on cloud-hosted recovery environments and global software orchestration. Complex Multiplatform & Legacy DR Specialists Overlap: Managed recovery runbooks, testing, and continuous replication. Important differences: Recovery Point Systems supports non-x86 architectures like IBM iSeries and Z Mainframes, while 11:11 focuses on x86 virtualized and cloud architectures.

Sources: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

What the AI said and what we found

What the AI said

11:11 Systems positions itself as an integrated managed infrastructure provider uniting cloud, connectivity, and cyber resilience. Compared to colocation-centric rivals like TierPoint and Flexential, 11:11 emphasizes a software-driven cloud platform with unified management through its Cloud Console and a global data footprint. Against multiplatform specialists like Recovery Point Systems, 11:11 focuses heavily on VMware and hypervisor-level replication (Veeam, Zerto) rather than mainframe legacy estates. Buyers choose 11:11 Systems when consolidating multi-region VMware workloads with turnkey disaster recovery.

What we found when we checked

Some points were supported, while others needed more context or changes.

  • 11:11 Systems is a managed infrastructure solutions provider delivering DRaaS, cloud, connectivity, and security services.
  • 11:11 DRaaS supports both physical and virtualized workloads, recoverable to 11:11's secure cloud, AWS, or Azure, using Cohesity, Veeam, HPE, and Zerto technologies.
  • 11:11 Systems holds VMware Cloud Service Provider Pinnacle Tier status under the Broadcom Advantage Partner Program.
  • TierPoint DRaaS platform supports HPE Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, IBM Recovery, and VMware Live Site Recovery across more than 40 U.S. data centers.
  • TierPoint operates more than 40 state-of-the-art data centers across the United States.
  • Flexential provides DRaaS solutions across U.S. data centers.
  • Recovery Point Systems supports non-x86 architectures including IBM Power and Z Mainframe platforms.

What we changed

We kept supported details and removed or qualified points that the independent check could not confirm.

Sources we used

Question 6

Why should a buyer choose 11:11 Systems?

Buyers should choose 11:11 Systems when they require an established VMware-centric cloud platform with hands-on recovery support. The provider is well suited for mid-sized and distributed enterprises seeking to offload the burden of maintaining secondary disaster recovery data centers. Because 11:11 Systems integrates backup, DRaaS, and managed connectivity under a single console, organizations can coordinate multi-region failover and compliance reporting without stitching together disparate vendors. Additionally, its Pinnacle Partner status in the Broadcom VMware Cloud Service Provider ecosystem offers licensing stability for organizations navigating recent virtualization market changes.

Sources: [1] [3]

Question 7

Why might a buyer choose a competitor instead of 11:11 Systems?

A buyer might choose an alternative if their IT strategy is committed to hyperscale public clouds like AWS or Microsoft Azure, where native replication tools (such as Azure Site Recovery) eliminate third-party hosting margins. Organizations with substantial legacy mainframe or mid-range UNIX estates often prefer specialists like Recovery Point Systems, which support non-x86 workloads. Furthermore, organizations requiring physical colocation cages near local corporate offices may favor colocation-heavy providers like TierPoint or Flexential over 11:11 Systems' standardized cloud pod architecture.

Sources: [6] [7]

What the AI said and what we found

What the AI said

A buyer might choose an alternative if their IT strategy is committed to hyperscale public clouds like AWS or Microsoft Azure, where native replication tools (such as Azure Site Recovery) eliminate third-party hosting margins. Organizations with substantial legacy mainframe or mid-range UNIX estates often prefer specialists like Recovery Point Systems, which support non-x86 workloads. Furthermore, organizations requiring physical colocation cages near local corporate offices may favor colocation-heavy providers like TierPoint or Flexential over 11:11 Systems' standardized cloud pod architecture.

What we found when we checked

The information we checked was supported.

Sources we used

Question 8

What are 11:11 Systems's key strengths and limitations?

A major strength of 11:11 Systems is its deep virtualization and data protection integration, underpinned by top-tier VMware and Veeam partnerships and a mature DRaaS management console inherited and enhanced from its iland acquisition. Another strength is its global geographic footprint, providing resilient data centers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific for multi-national compliance. Conversely, a primary trade-off is the platform's heavy reliance on VMware-centric technologies, making it less attractive for cloud-native or container-first organizations. Additionally, rapid inorganic growth through multiple acquisitions (including iland, Green Cloud Defense, and Ntirety) requires buyers to verify operational integration and consistent tier-1 support across legacy customer bases.

Sources: [3] [4] [5]

Question 9

What buyers should verify before purchasing from 11:11 Systems

1. Confirm Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) SLAs during disaster declarations versus scheduled tests. 2. Verify the division of responsibility between in-house engineers and 11:11 Systems staff during an actual recovery event. 3. Validate network egress fees and compute burst billing terms when running production workloads inside the recovery cloud during failover. 4. Check compliance certifications and physical data hosting locations for sensitive industry workloads. 5. Audit post-acquisition support workflows to ensure ticket escalation processes are unified across all acquired service units.

Sources: [1] [2]

Other points to check

These notes came with the category Top 10 result. They suggest questions to raise with vendors—not verified findings about 11:11 Systems or reasons for its position.

Read the original test notes
  • DRaaS execution success is heavily dependent on regular non-disruptive failover testing, runbook synchronization, and clearly negotiated RTO/RPO SLAs rather than the replication software alone.
  • Heterogeneous physical environments, non-x86 architectures (e.g., IBM Power/Mainframe), and legacy bare-metal servers require specialized provider infrastructure and typically do not support instantaneous multi-tenant failover.
Question 10

Why might AI recommend 11:11 Systems's competitors instead?

TierPoint may be recommended when a buyer explicitly requires physical colocation facilities alongside cloud-based disaster recovery across more than 40 U.S. data centers, particularly where hybrid data center real estate and colocation space are a procurement requirement. TierPoint's DRaaS platform supports multiple technologies including HPE Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, IBM Recovery, and VMware Live Site Recovery. Expedient may be suggested if an organization seeks an integrated multi-cloud operating environment with direct support for VMware platforms; buyers should confirm Nutanix support and specific push-button DR service details directly with Expedient, as these were not independently verified in this review. Recovery Point Systems will likely be surfaced for enterprise buyers that must orchestrate disaster recovery across non-x86 legacy hardware, such as IBM Power systems and Z Mainframes, which fall outside standard VMware-focused cloud offerings.

Sources: [7] [8] [9] [14]

What the AI said and what we found

What the AI said

TierPoint, LLC may be recommended when a buyer explicitly requires physical colocation facilities and hybrid data center real estate across diverse U.S. regions alongside cloud-to-cloud disaster recovery. Expedient may be suggested if an organization seeks an integrated multi-cloud operating environment featuring its proprietary Push Button DR service and direct support for Nutanix and VMware platforms. Recovery Point Systems will likely be surfaced for enterprise buyers that must orchestrate disaster recovery across non-x86 legacy hardware, such as IBM Power systems and Z Mainframes, which fall outside standard VMware-focused cloud offerings.

What we found when we checked

Some points were supported, while others needed more context or changes.

  • TierPoint operates more than 40 data centers across the United States and offers DRaaS alongside colocation services.
  • TierPoint DRaaS supports HPE Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, IBM Recovery, and VMware Live Site Recovery.
  • Expedient provides disaster recovery as a service solutions.
  • Recovery Point Systems delivers disaster recovery services supporting IBM Power and Z Mainframe platforms.

What we changed

We kept supported details and removed or qualified points that the independent check could not confirm.

Sources we used

Question 11

Which companies appeared in the category Top 10?

11:11 Systems ranked #1
  1. #1
    11:11 Systems Inc.

    Website listed in this result: 1111systems.com

    Evaluated offering: 11:11 Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    Offers an extensive managed and co-managed DRaaS portfolio combining its proprietary Cloud Console with replication architectures built on Veeam, Zerto, and Cohesity, reinforced by the enterprise recovery capabilities acquired from Sungard Availability Services.

  2. #2
    TierPoint, LLC

    Website listed in this result: tierpoint.com

    Evaluated offering: TierPoint Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    Provides fully managed and self-service DRaaS spanning hybrid multi-tenant, private cloud, and colocation footprints across 20+ U.S. markets, supporting virtualized (VMware/Hyper-V) and physical server environments with near-zero RTO/RPO targets.

  3. #3
    Recovery Point Systems, Inc.

    Website listed in this result: recoverypoint.com

    Evaluated offering: Recovery Point Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    Recognized enterprise DRaaS specialist with deep capability in protecting heterogeneous enterprise environments, bridging physical workloads, IBM Power/Z Mainframe, and x86 virtualized systems with orchestrated, non-disruptive DR testing.

  4. #4
    Expedient

    Website listed in this result: expedient.com

    Evaluated offering: Expedient Push Button Disaster Recovery

    Specializes in managed 'Push Button DR' solutions designed for multi-site failover and fast recovery of virtualized workloads (VMware and Nutanix AHV) and physical systems across sovereign U.S. data centers.

  5. #5
    Flexential Corp.

    Website listed in this result: flexential.com

    Evaluated offering: Flexential Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    Delivers comprehensive managed and co-managed DRaaS paired with continuous data protection across dozens of U.S. data centers, supporting colocation, hybrid-premise, and virtual cloud workloads with 24/7 runbook execution.

  6. #6
    Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

    Website listed in this result: kyndryl.com

    Evaluated offering: Kyndryl Hybrid Platform Recovery with DRaaS

    Global enterprise infrastructure services provider delivering managed resiliency and cloud disaster recovery orchestration across complex physical, mainframe, and virtualized enterprise estates.

  7. #7
    InterVision Systems, LLC

    Website listed in this result: intervision.com

    Evaluated offering: InterVision Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)

    Provides enterprise-grade managed DRaaS using a structured 'Recovery Assurance' methodology, providing failover automation, managed playbooks, and contractual RTO/RPO SLAs across hybrid on-premise and cloud workloads.

  8. #8
    Rackspace Technology, Inc.

    Website listed in this result: rackspace.com

    Evaluated offering: Rackspace SDDC Flex Disaster Recovery as a Service

    Delivers fully managed DRaaS across VMware, multicloud, and private colocation environments, managing continuous data protection, replication pipelines, and guided failover orchestration.

  9. #9
    Ensono, LP

    Website listed in this result: ensono.com

    Evaluated offering: Ensono Cloud Disaster Recovery Managed Service

    Provides hybrid managed disaster recovery services tailored for mission-critical enterprise environments spanning mainframes, distributed physical servers, and modern public cloud platforms.

  10. #10
    Iron Mountain Incorporated

    Website listed in this result: ironmountain.com

    Evaluated offering: Iron Mountain Disaster Recovery Service

    Combines physical infrastructure security with Iron Cloud managed cyber recovery and disaster recovery services, bridging physical media vaulting, bare-metal workloads, and cloud recovery zones.

Search history

Top 10 searches featuring 11:11 Systems

These are saved searches in which 11:11 Systems appeared. A result may originate from another company’s Buyer Guide; it is not necessarily 11:11 Systems’s own generated Question 11 test. Results may cover different buyer needs, locations, or dates.

Buyer needLocationPositionModelDate
Mid-market and enterprise organizations in North America evaluating outsourced or…North America#10 of 10GeminiSep 29, 2026
Enterprises evaluating fully managed or co-managed DRaaS to protect virtualized and…United States#1 of 10GeminiSep 29, 2026
Why positions vary
Evidence trail

Sources

These links record what the AI cited. A listed link does not, by itself, mean we verified a claim against its contents.

[4]
https://1111systems.com/why-1111/Retrieved Sep 29, 2026
[7]
https://www.recoverypoint.com/Retrieved Sep 29, 2026
[16]
https://1111systems.com/Retrieved Sep 29, 2026
About this test

How this search was run

These are the inputs to one recorded search—not a verified description of 11:11 Systems or its service area.

Model used
Gemini
Market searched
Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)
Buyer need
Enterprises evaluating fully managed or co-managed DRaaS to protect virtualized and physical workloads against unplanned downtime
Region searched
United States
Test date
Sep 29, 2026

Why this page exists: Buyers use AI to research vendors before making a shortlist. We preserve each response and its test date so you can see what appeared in that search.

How responses are checked: Selected questions about competition, differentiation, concerns, and recommendations are sent to a second model to check against available sources. Where that review produces usable findings, we show the original response and what the review found or changed. Other answers may cite sources without a separate review.

How the search is chosen: Before the Top 10 test, one model identifies the most appropriate market, buyer need, and region for this company. A second model reviews those inputs. The reviewed inputs become the search used for the blind Top 10 test. The market shown is where the test placed the company, not a category verified by TMC or chosen by the company. It may be broader, narrower, or different from how the company describes itself. That difference is part of what this page records.

What the ranking means: The Category Top 10 shows how the company appeared in this specific search. It is not a measure of quality, size, or market share. The reviewing model checks the test inputs, not the returned ranking. Linked names have live company profiles; identity verification does not independently verify every recommendation claim.

For companies: This record shows what the test picked up and which sources it cited. Missing or mistaken details may point to public information worth clarifying, but do not by themselves explain why the response said what it did.

Exact test setup and model roles

This result uses a two-model process before the ranking. Gemini proposed the most applicable provider category, buying context, and geography from its company research; Claude independently reviewed and could correct those inputs. The final Top 10 list was then generated by one blind test of Gemini, which received the reviewed category, buying context, geography, and date—but not 11:11 Systems’s identity. Claude did not review or rerank the returned Top 10 list, so the ranking itself is not a consensus across AI systems. Provider names identify the AI family; exact model versions and testing configuration are maintained internally.

The original test notes are available with the buyer checklist.

Results across different searches

2 recorded searches · positions #1, #10

The market, buyer need, and region can differ across tests. Each Top 10 uses the inputs recorded for that search, so the company list and its position may change.

  • #10 · Managed IT and cybersecurity service providers · North America · Sep 29, 2026
Compare the recorded searches
Company research

Other Buyer Guide research

These records show where this company appeared while the Buyer Guide was researching related companies and markets.

Market
Managed Cloud & Infrastructure Provider
Observed
Sep 30, 2026

Originating researchTelesystem

Why the company appeared in that research

Competes in managed IT infrastructure and secure network connectivity for regional enterprises.

Related companies from the same research

AireSpring

CBTS

Comcast Corporation

Dataprise

Ensono

Fusion Connect

Granite Telecommunications, LLC

MetTel

Netrix Global

NexusTek

Ntiva

Synoptek

Telesystem

Reader perspectives

Community notes

Notes are unverified reader submissions, not TMC endorsements. They may refer to an earlier version of this listing.

No community notes yet.

Add a community note

Anyone can post. Your note will appear publicly as submitted; do not include private information. Admins may hide inappropriate notes.